![]() |
| Sir Peter Lely's portrait of Oliver Cromwell, "warts and all." |
For me, John Sevier is a compelling subject for the same reason that history is compelling. He is a man of contradictions. On the one hand, he was a hero of the American Revolution, having fought in the Battle of Kings Mountain, and was a legend on the frontier. He was politically savvy, having led an unsuccessful effort to carve a state from the foothills of the Smoky Mountains, but undeterred, he eventually guided Tennessee to statehood and became its first governor. And even in the twilight of his years, John Sevier was compelled to serve his country in the backwoods where his reputation as a fearless Indian fighter was made many years before. He died in relative obscurity in the woods of Alabama, only to have his legend resurrected generations later by those who would find his life's exploits worthy of honor and recognition.
But on the other hand, John Sevier was also someone whom the pages of history shows was not perfect. He was accused of treason for conspiring with Spain in his effort to create the State of Franklin. He encroached on Native American lands and led armies in the slaughter of hundreds of people in his drive to claim the western edge of the Appalachians. A compelling argument can also be made that John Sevier provoked Andrew Jackson into a duel by insulting his wife, behaved like a coward in the face of threats of retaliation, and actually feared Jackson to such an extent that "Old Hickory" invaded his dreams.
![]() |
| John Sevier Statue inside National Statuary Hall. |
This thought-provoking encounter actually gave me an opportunity to consider the larger issue of how history has been corrupted by politicians and well-meaning citizen activists who see their idyllic world crumbling all around them, and in an effort to understand what is happening to our nation, they reach into the past for answers from America's heroes. In the process, they place these heroes on an unreachable pedestal where they are no longer considered human beings. To them, they are gods.
Perhaps I can best explain my take on John Sevier this way: I have never claimed to be a Sevier scholar, but I do have an avid interest in this subject. So, in my effort to learn as much as I can about John Sevier, I have endeavored to read as many historical accounts about him as possible. The narrative that I have found in the biographies of John Sevier in particular -- written primarily by lawyers and antiquarians who were admirers of John Sevier and who had little or no training in the study of history -- is effusive with praise for "Nolichucky Jack," with absolutely no reference to Sevier's flaws.
Sevier's biographers are, in many instances of his life, our only link to his past. Over time, the memory that has built up around these narratives has become the primary source of information for those who wish to study John Sevier. In many ways, the memory of John Sevier as chronicled by his biographers is as intriguing as the man himself.
John Sevier was an important figure in the early history of Tennessee and deserves further recognition and study. A more scholarly biography of John Sevier is certainly long overdue. Perhaps one day, someone will take on this subject and give John Sevier a complete and up-to-date biography. In the meantime, I cannot view history through rose-colored glasses. I would rather know the truth of what happened in the past. That is my motive, "warts and all."
Gordon Belt is an information professional, archives advocate, public historian, and founding editor of The Posterity Project. Gordon is the Director of Public Services for the Tennessee State Library & Archives, and past president of the Society of Tennessee Archivists. On The Posterity Project, Gordon blogs about archives, local history, genealogy, social media advocacy for archives and cultural heritage organizations, and occasionally writes about the convergence of history and memory.


5 comments:
Hi, I have a couple of questions about John Sevier (my sixth great-grandfather, about whom I've been doing research) for which maybe you can provide the answers:
I notice that Andrew Jackson is listed on the Grand Lodge of Tennessee's website as a "Famous Freemason", but that Sevier is not. Does that mean Sevier was not ever a Freemason, or does it mean that he was but later somehow fell out of favor with that fraternity?
Also, part two of my question: What was Sevier's personal and/or official attitude and/or opinion of the Constitution of 1787, either before or after its ratification? A number of Founding Fathers (Patrick Henry, Benjamin Rush, Thomas Paine, Benjamin Franklin, etc.) are on record with specific criticisms and suggestions for that important legal document, but I've yet to find any evidence that Sevier commented on it at all.
Thanks in advance for any help solving these mysteries, you might be able to provide.
Thanks for your comment, Debra. In my own research on John Sevier, I have yet to encounter any evidence that he was a Freemason, nor have I seen in any of his writings his thoughts on the Constitution, but this is a fascinating question that deserves further inquiry.
One of the great things about publishing my ongoing research on John Sevier in a public forum such as this is that I receive feedback from readers, in comments like yours and in email form. These exchanges provide me with an opportunity to explore other avenues of inquiry that I had not considered. It's also a great way to tap into the knowledge of others on this subject. I've learned as much from other readers who have written to me about John Sever as I have in my own research.
I think a reply to this question actually deserves its own blog post in response. I'll investigate this and let you know what I uncover in my research.
Best regards,
- Gordon
Thank you, Gordon; I appreciate your interest in the subject, and look forward with great anticipation to any future blog posts you might publish along those lines.
Debra,
Regarding part one of your two-part question, I conducted a cursory search of the book, "The History of Freemasonry in Tennessee, 1789-1943" by Charles Albert Snodgrass. In the index there are several mentions of John Sevier, including one on page 46 which reveals the following:
"(Polk) Tennessee Lodge No. 2 (N.C. 41) Knoxville was chartered at Knoxville by the Grand Lodge of North Carolina November 30, 1800, naming as its first Master one of the most distinguished characters in Tennessee history--His Excellency General John Sevier, Governor of Tennessee..."
There is also a Masonic biography of John Sevier on page 415 of this book.
As I said in an earlier comment, I think this little-known aspect of John Sevier's life deserves further inquiry. Hopefully there will be enough information to write a blog post about it, but in the meantime I wanted you to have this information.
You can find this book at the Tennessee State Library and Archives. Although you cannot check out books from the collection, you can view them in the South Reading Room. I'd encourage you to visit the TSLA website to learn more about the collection. You can also check out the Visitors Guide for hours, location, and parking should you choose to visit TSLA in person.
Thank you Gordon; I doubt I could have uncovered that info by myself. I was beginning to believe he never was a Mason at all, lol. Seems a little strange to me, that he isn't mentioned on their main website along with other "Famous Freemasons".
Going off your lead, I found the following online source:
http://books.google.com/books?id=d08uAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA25&lpg=PA25&dq=polk+tennessee+lodge+number+2&source=bl&ots=MVRSxWxJM5&sig=MWcpVMV65wtElpznUik5uXfbyME&hl=en&sa=X&ei=dMoOUZeoGIPJyAG7p4GYDQ&ved=0CEcQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=polk%20tennessee%20lodge%20number%202&f=false
"The Beginnings of Freemasonry in North Carolina and Tennessee" by Marshall De Lancey Haywood, c1906
"Tennessee Lodge, No. 41 of North Carolina, No. 2 of Tennessee, chartered November 30, 1800 by Grand Master William Polk. This was called Polk Lodge while it was working under dispensation. Possibly the latter title was not retained because the Grand Master felt a delicacy in creating by charter a Lodge named for himself. The charter officers of this Lodge were: Governor John Sevier, Worshipful Master; James Grant, Senior Warden, and George Washington Campbell, Junior Warden."
(Still looking forward to learning his thoughts regarding the Constitution, and wishing you success in finding something along those lines.)
Thanks always, Debra
Post a Comment